Your Fairbanks Historical Society Since 1959
October 1998 Newsletter
Vol. 3, No. 10
Index
Creamer's
Dairy National Historic Site has been awarded $498,000 in ISTEA funds to stabilize
the historic barns. Friends of Creamer's Field, The National Trust of Historic Preservation,
the Tanana-Yukon Historical Society and others have labored hard over the last few
years to get the ISTEA funds restored to Creamer's National Historic Site. It took
a Preservation Services Grant from the National Trust for Historic Preservation to
make it happen. With the grant, Friends of Creamer's were able to acquire the services
of Dave Ciolek, a barn restoration specialist from Michigan. The final report brought
the cost of stabilization into focus, enabling the Alaska Department of Transportation
and Public Facilities to provide the needed funding.
While the monies will cover the cost of initial stabilization of the barns, more money is needed to make the barns accessible to the public. In the interim, planning can go forward on the multi-purpose use of the facility, and the surrounding area can be cleaned up to make it more user friendly, and a plan for a future storage facility can be done by the ADF&G so the barn will be available for its higher purpose as an interpretive facility for our community's history.
The Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities is busily preparing to implement the new TEA-21, the successor to ISTEA, and this is a perfect time for the Fairbanks Historical Commission, the Fairbanks City Council and the assembly of the Fairbanks North Star Borough to discuss the enhancement program in general and historic preservation in particular.
A program that takes into account the unique qualities of our historic structures along transportation corridors and the effect such corridors can have on the fragile environments of our neighborhoods ideally would be a major concern for our DOT/PF officials. Our elected officials, whether on the local or state level, must be reminded that historic preservation enhancements are crucial considerations for the quality of community.
In our state, historic preservation's role in transportation issues is not easily comprehended. Agencies, if not outright indifferent to historic enhancement proposals, have other priorities (such as trails) which consume the bulk of state enhancement allocations. While more trails are certainly a welcome enhancement, they seldom require the urgent attention that is often inherent to historic preservation projectsó nor do they yield the immediate, almost instantaneous benefits to community which a historic preservation project can impart.
In Alaska, preservation projects funded with ISTEA monies have had a rocky history. The point system used by Transportation officials to prioritize projects was developed with new construction in mind and when applied to preservation projects comes with a natural discrimination. Their staff training does not include rehabilitation projects as a rule. Agencies accustomed to building roads have a reluctance to focus on the need of historic preservation as an important feature along our transportation corridors. There is also a pervasive unwillingness to tap into available expertise either on the local or state level which is unfortunate. A change in the way committee members are selected may therefore make a world of difference. The historic preservation community needs to have a presence on selection committees.
There is also a lot of confusion in the process used to determine qualification of projects. It would be most helpful to both the community and the Dept. of Transportation if ADOT were to develop a format to educate potential sponsors about the TEA-21 program and to assist in developing high quality programs. This would help to avoid conflicts that result from hastily prepared proposals and also would encourage state officials to become acquainted with certain community needs. Efforts made by DOT to educate the local community on potential historic and cultural resource enhancement projects and to assist in developing better proposals would go a long way toward making TEA-21 a success.
Historic buildings are often unique landmarks and establish the essential character
of place. ADOT/PF needs to consider the preservation of the built environment and
its potential role in stimulating economic development while maintaining community
character.
The role of preservation within the state's preservation program will depend on the
decisions ADOT/PF is making now. If we are to take full advantage of the financial
resources provided by TEA-21 the historic preservation community has to become involved
now in the selection process.
ADOT should make a concerted effort to educate the local community about proposals
for the TEA-21 cultural enhancement projects and invite informed participation. This
would go a long way toward making TEA-21 a success.
This pending legislation deserves all our support. If passed, the legislation would provide similar tax credits to owners of historic homes as is now enjoyed by owners of historic properties used for business purposes. This legislation would be a boon for downtown property owners in Fairbanks and throughout Alaska. Your support is needed.
Last month your Editor (and his devoted staff) journeyed to Dawson, Yukon Territory. It is far afield but seems appropriate to discuss here since our history is closely tied to the Dawson area. Your Editor remembers when the capital was moved to Whitehorse and it is inspiring to see how the Canadians have stopped the dete- rioration of their town and are restoring many structures to their former elegance. The Commissioner's Residence, which has been restored to its 1914 grandeur is period-correct and has nearly 85% of its original furnishings. Equally impressive are new structures that are sympathetic to the neighborhood. One that comes to mind is the visitor's center, which is a reproduction of the Alaska Commercial Company building. It includes the axe marks of the hand-hewn, pre-power tool era one likes to see, and yet it is recent construction (1985). Parks Canada/Parcs Canada really deserves commendation for their commitment to preserving the past. Dawson is an excellent example of the compatibility of economic development and historic preservation. Fairbanks could learn a great deal from Dawson.
There is a lot to do in the Dawson area, and it is a comfortable one-day drive from Fairbanks. Next time we hope to take the round trip by boat from Dawson to Eagle.
|
Tanana-Yukon
Alaska & Polar Regions Department Lectures 7:00 pm, Noel Wien Library Auditorium
|
On
October 12, the Fairbanks City Council approved the sale of Block 13, between First
and Second Avenues, to Town Square Properties of Anchorage. Leonard Hyde, one of
the partners in the development company, expressed his desire to include a list of
community concerns in his project, but to date, there is no formal binding agreement
on just which concerns shall be addressed.
The lack of guidance for Block 13 development by the City of Fairbanks and the Fairbanks NorthStar Borough is regrettable. Several individuals brought up as "worst scenario" the example of the Key Bank building when expressing their fear in granting the developer carte blanc. Many persons spoke to this issue during public testimony including Renee Blahuta and Kelley Hegarty Lammars, chairperson of the Chena Riverfront Commission. Most of the concerns expresssed could be grouped into the following categories:
Look for more on Block 13 in the November newsletter.
The Tanana-Yukon Historical Society is published monthly September - May and occasionally during the summer. Subscriptions are $10.00 (includes annual membership). Mail to TYHS, P. O. Box 71336, Fairbanks, Alaska 99707-1336. Submissions for possible publication to Backlund, PO Box 82349, Fairbanks, AK 99708-2349 or e-mail to kestrels@alaska.net